Quantcast
Channel: Tagged with anamorphic - Personal View Talks
Viewing all 69 articles
Browse latest View live

Music video shot on Lumix GH3 and anamorphic adaptor at 50fps

$
0
0

Please have a look at the music promo I made on a Lumix GH3.

If you're interested in the tecky stuff, here it is, otherwise please just enjoy the pictures!

I used a kowa 8-Z anamorphic adaptor, mounted on a voigtlander Nokton 35mm F1.2. I also had a Tokina .4 achromat and a Cokin Diopter +2 for the Close ups.

It was all shot at night which presented problems as I found the Lumix isn't very good in low light. I was shooting at 50fps which reduced the amount of light I had even further. I also found that if the lens was fully open it was difficult to get a focus. Not because it was too shallow, but because it wouldn't focus on anything with the adaptor.

As you can see I over-cranked the ISO (accidentally went to 3200 when I thought I was on 1600), but I couldn't set lights up on the banks of the Thames at 3am, as we didn't have permission to be there. I wish I'd got someone to stand close by reflecting a bright torch off a white shirt though. I can only hope that I get away with the graininess in the spirit of low/no budget film making, and it looks like 16mm. I couldn't ask the actors to go back into the Thames for me!

I think the Lumix in low light has given the film a real 'look' but in all honesty I wasn't impressed by how much colour information it recorded. This camera really needs light to work well.

You can also see the notorious shutter wobble a few times. Weirdly it doesn't bother me in this video, as I think it suits the slightly surreal mood. Same goes for the sodium street lights making the flicker. I wanted to keep the shutter above 100 (I was shooting 50fps), but I could have decreased flicker by reducing the shutter speed. However, I decided to embrace it, and instead increased the shutter, which made the flicker more pronounced.

Staying close up to the actors, using the diopters, gave me a picture I liked the most. The bokeh looks lovely and soft and cinematic. Shots where I had to focus to infinity were difficult - the bokeh is ugly in those shots (in my opinion), taking the shape of a kind of horizontal tear. But I couldn't film the whole video in close ups!

It was difficult to shot this as a one-man-band. Having to screw two different diopters on or off every time I wanted to change my proximity to the actors made it quite fiddly. I was also moving lights (I had x3 LED panels). I had some other taking lenses, but it wasn't practical to change during the shoot.

Lastly, I know its normal to crop the super-wide picture you get from shooting 2x anamorphic on a 16:9 sensor, but I decided to embrace it. It's fun, and a bit silly, but its a music promo, so why not.

Hope you enjoy. The track by Durlston George, his debut single, is lovely.


Experiments in Super Wide Anamorphic CinemaScope 2.35:1

$
0
0

Experiments in Super Wide Anamorphic, ungraded footage, camera NEX 5N. (-3,1,-3) Including some tighter shots for comparison. Hyperfocal distance is tiny at these focal lengths. Cylindrical distortion is normal at these focal lengths. Ultra Wide Anamorphic will come later on Canon 5D

SLR Magic ANAMORPHOT 1,33X 50

$
0
0

This thread is dedicated to new product from SLR magic. The Anamorphic adapter 1,33x.

will cost $799 for the anamorphic adapter.

Product is on testing phase, but as it says on article product will not change from final design. They need testers pre buyers.

The volunteer test kit contains the following -

  • SLR Magic – ANAMORPHOT 1,33 x 50 (RRP $799)
  • SLR Magic 35mm T1.4 CINE II is (RRP $499)
  • SLR Magic +0.4 Achromatic Diopter 77mm + SLR Magic +1.3 Achromatic Diopter 77mm (RRP $299)
  • SLR Magic will offer the above set to volunteer testers for a reduced price of $1300.

Link removed. Selling of SLR Magic lenses on P-V is prohibited from now on.

More images will be uploaded soon.

Carl Zeiss Ananmorphic + GH4 + 4k, Job Done!

$
0
0

hi all, after 2years sitting on my shelf my 10 Tone Zeiss anamorphic was dusted off for a test. Im sure the weight of the freakin thing is over 2KG! I was going to do a test on my GH2 but never got round to it. Its a very difficult combination to use , but i think its worth it, and only for that special project. Have a gander...stu.

DIMENSIONS - Fashion Film

GH4 V2.0 anamorphic shoot in new photo mode 4:3

$
0
0

Some moods testing the new photo mode in the 4:3 ratio with my 2X kowa anamorphic adapter. More in the description. Very nice addition to an already fantastic little camera.

FS: BMPCC, Sigma 18-35 f1.8, SLR MAgic Anamorphot. Go pro Hero 3 Black

$
0
0

BlackMagic Pocket Cinema Camera SOLD:
- 2 SanDisk Extreme pro SDXC 64GB 95mb/s
- 4 extra batteries
- 2 Extra external Chargers
Price: 730 UK pounds + Shipping SOLD

SLR Magic Anamorphot 1,33 50
- 3 Diopters +1 +2 +3 Tiffen Series 9
- Adapter Ring for Series 9 tiffen filters 77mm
Price: 880 UK Pounds + Shipping

Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 ART - Nikon mount
Price:525 UK Pounds +Shipping

GoPro Hero 3 Black Edtion + Touch LCD
- Touch LCD
- 3 Extra Batteries
- 1 External Charger
- Chest and Head Strap
Price:370 UK Pounds + Shipping

-Will Ship internationally
-PayPal Payment

Thanks!

My Impatient GH4 Anamorphic Lens Test (4K Photo Modes)

$
0
0

The Rectimascop 48/2x Anamorphic Lens arrived in the mail today.
I'm still waiting for the clamp to properly connect it to the GH4 lens, but I couldn't wait to try it out, so I did some test shots in my living room, connecting the Rectimascop to a Helios 44/2 lens using a reverse macro ring.
It's not properly aligned, as you can see from the flares, but I love the character and the new artistic possibilities opened by the new 4K photo mode with its new aspect ratios (1:1, 3:2, 4:3).
I'm also waiting for a diopter from Ebay to shoot closer objects.

GH4, Cine D profile, Helios 44/2 lens, Rectimascop 48/2x Anamorphic Lens
Music by me.
Edited with FCPX.
All flares were done in camera. :)


Anamorphic Magic Hour in Tel Aviv (GH4)

$
0
0

My second anamorphic test with the Rectimascop 48/2x lens, this time checking infinity focus and sharpness.
Shot in Tel Aviv, Oct. 24, 2014 using a Panasonic GH4 in 4K Photo Mode, 3:2 aspect ratio, Cine D.
Lenses: Helios 44/2 58mm, Rectimascop 48/2x anamorphic.
Music by me.
Edited and graded with FCPX.

The Long and Widescreen Road - My 3rd Anamorphic exercise with GH4 in Photo Mode

$
0
0

My 3rd anamorphic test.
This afternoon I took my unfinished contraption (still waiting for the proper clamp) on the road, straight into the Tel Aviv Saturday evening traffic.

Shot in Tel Aviv, Oct. 25th, 2014 using a Panasonic GH4 in 4K Photo Mode, 3:2 aspect ratio, Cine D.
Lenses: Helios 44/2 58mm, Rectimascop 48/2x anamorphic.
Music by Jimi Hendrix.
Edited and graded with FCPX.

The Bike (GH4 anamorphic)

$
0
0

An 8 second Anamorphic short, using the GH4 in 4K photo mode and a Rectimascop 48/2x anamorphic lens.

Maximum FOV with 2X anamorphic lenses when cropped

$
0
0

Hey, all! Perhaps someone could do a quick test for me or maybe you already know . . .

2X anamorphic lenses provide a very wide 3.55:1 aspect ratio when shooting in 16:9. When I get an anamorphic, I plan to have my final product be either 2.39:1 (or occasionally 2.75:1 if I'm feeling gutsy).

I have found plenty of info on how wide of "taking" glass the various 2X anamorphic lenses can utilize without vignetting, but only when used at 3.5:1. (For example, a Kowa 8Z/16H in 3.55:1 is good down to a 35mm "taking" lens on GH2.)

But if I'm cropping off the sides of my final product to 2.39:1, I would assume I should be able to use a bit wider of a taking lens, even if it vignettes on 16:9, as long as I'm able to crop out the vignette on the sides when trimming down to 2.39:1 from 3.55:1.

What many people get excited with when thinking about anamorphic lenses (especially the 2X crop sensor GH2 crowd) is that the anamorphic gives a wider field of view. While this is true in the horizontal sense of the term, it is not true in the vertical sense. A 35mm taking lens with an anamorphic adapter on front may have twice the field of view horizontally, but vertically it is still a 35mm field of view (70mm equivalent on GH2). This doesn't really help you "get wider" for narrative work in which you are framing up people, where extra vertical field of view is what actually matters.

If cropping 2X anamorphic footage down to 2.39:1 allows the use of an even slightly wider "taking" lens, then I would encourage anamorphic junkies out there to start experimenting with this strategy. even if you loos a bit of horizontal resolution, remember the footage still maintains full 1080 lines vertical, which will keep it looking sharp, even when stretched.

Does anyone know how much more you gain when cropping like this? Using my example of a Kowa, could it be good down to 25mm with the sides cropped to 2.39:1?

HOW SINGLE FOCUS ANAMORPHIC ATTACHMENTS WORK

Stormy - a short anamorphic film - now in 4K. Possibly 4K streaming?

$
0
0

There are indications that Vimeo are testing 4K streaming.
I uploaded a new 4K Master file of my short anamorphic film Stormy.
Can anyone test 4K streaming?
For you pixel peepers, the 4K file is available for download.

FS Bolex Moller anamorphot 8/19/1.5


One Week with SLR Magic Anamorphot 2x (GH4 UHD 4:3)

$
0
0

Hello anamorphic shooters ! Here is my very first shots with the upcoming SLR Magic Anamorphot 2x ! Thanks for watching ! :)

One week with SLR Magic Anamorphot 2x on Voigtlander Ultron 28mm f1.9 on Canon FD 50mm f1.4 + Metabones Speed Booster on Canon FD 35mm f2 As you can see the Canon FD work better than the Voigtlander All the close up were taken without diopter except when it's written GH4 UHD 4:3 Cinelike V 0 -5 -5 -2 +2 Lumetri CC and levels adjustments Everything was shot @f4 / f5.6 except some close shot @1.9 in the first part SLR Magic achromatic diopters +0.33, +1.3, +1.8 and Narumi achromatic +3 diopter

Found this lens in a thrift shop

$
0
0

I need some help figuring out how to use this lens I found in a thrift shop. I've been lurking around this forum for a couple weeks and you guys seem like the friendliest most knowledgeable group so I figured I'd give you a shot.

I'm pretty new to m43 photography, and digital in general. My last camera was a Minolta X370. I just went out and bought a used GH2 and an adapter for my old MD mount 50mm f1.7, but I've been wanting more lenses so I was cruising local thrift shops and I came across something that looked like an anamorphic lens. I bought it without thinking (it was pretty cheap) but now I have no idea how to use it.

It says "SANKOR ANAMO-PRIME LENS f=95mm-3.74in Japan" on the side in blue letters. I googled that and apparently there are a million just like it on ebay, but no reviews, camera tests, stats, nothing. It looks kinda like this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sankor-Anamo-Prime-Anamorphic-f-95mm-3-74-in-Theater-Proector-Lens-/271743605595?nma=true&si=Vg%252BTHgfPDrHc8kswmEhylSSwtXA%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

Except its a little more beat up.

I've read about mounting anamorphics with a taking lens and focusing both of them to the same distance, but that doesn't seem to be working for this one, or at least not with me hand holding it against my 50mm. It only cost $30, but after buying the GH2 I'm pretty broke and now I'm scared I threw away what money I had left on a shitty, unpopular lens I can't use.

Does anyone know anything about this lens?

Cooke anamorphic

$
0
0

Hey! Long time no see, been swamped in work - I thought I'd check in with some information that might be of interest as we shot a short last week on some wonderful new Cooke anamorphics. They took a huge chunk of the tech budget, however in the light of things I felt it was really worth it. Now, some purists say these and the Arri / Zeiss anamorphics are too clinical for their preference. In my opinion they are just right for keeping a safe production workflow when you can't always adapt the way you shoot to "the ideal" or when you have to adapt the way you shoot to what you shoot.

Let me recap. We shot the short on an fs700 coupled to an Odyssey 7q+. Wonderful, powerful couple, even if I'm not the biggest fan of Sony colors. I decided to stick between 2000 iso and 6400 iso for night shots, as we didn't have the budget for a lot of lighting equipment. 6400 iso noise is a bit bad, but workable. At most I could augment and mold natural light. We decided pretty early on that Anamorphic lenses would add a cinematic twist but also contribute to a sense of realism / immersion we were after in the production. Now, these new and very expensive anamorphics are sharp enough / corrected enough to be shot wide open and the mechanics are obviously top notch, making them as functional as any high quality spherical lens. Another things is; the short was shot almost entirely hand-held and when it comes to anamorphics, that can really skew things up badly if an adapter is only slightly off axis f.i.. I was a bit worried during the first day of shooting, as we didn't have a working live-grade setup for correcting the footage, however, I did not need to. These are perfectly corrected to not skew things up in a bad way, no matter how you shoot.

We ended up with the Cookes as the Arri/Zeiss ones had been booked by someone else, but they did not dissapoint one bit. After checking some tests online I chose the 40 and 75 as the former looked to have less CA / have better correction than the wider 32, while the 75 had some CA but allowed for different framing (The Arri Zeiss ones seem to be pretty identical, but the Cookes have some differences in-between them) and differences in distance emphasis, depending on location space. The lenses are massive, over 2 kg's, and I had to put together pieces from 2 different rigs to make it work, all in all we ended up with setup weighing in at around 10 kg's. After that, however, we hardly had to think any differently, though at the end of the shoot my eyes seemed to want to squeeze reality into 2x.

The bottom line, having lenses of this quality in the production allowed us to use anamorphics in the first place, to get a clear anamorphic look without the potential caveats of working with them, never taking time from the shoot. For a more extreme look, well, you may have that option with a bigger budget but then again, it's always possible to push things in the grade. (in doing both I retain control)

The lenses can be used at 2.3T (with sufficient sharpness), though I prefered to stay at 2.8 for most night exteriors. I'll add some sample frames here shortly, and update when I get into pregrade. If there are any surprises, I'll let you know.

4K C-mount anamorphic style baby Hypergonar on Pentax Cosmicar

$
0
0

Hi my anamorphic friend, here is a a new match I've found for my baby Hypergonar, the Pentax Cosmicar 25mm f1.4 C-mount lens, and I like the result, despite the distortion and the slight vignetting. What do you think ? (more information below)

Oleron Island (Baby Hypergonar on Pentax Cosmicar C-mount) GH4 UHD photo mode 3:2 25p Cinelike V +0 -5 -5 -2 +2 Highlight +1 Shadow +5 Master Pedestal +11 Pentax Cosmicar 25mm f1.4 C-mount lens Baby Hypergonar 1.75x anamorphic lens Redstan clamp SLR Magic +0.33, +1.3, +1.8 diopters, Narumi +3 diopter SLR Magic ND variable filter Lumetri CC and levels adjustments in Premiere Everything was shot between @f2 / f2.8 (because upper gives more vignetting) or more when exposition needs, except close shost with diopters @f1.4

Super Sharp ISCO Anamorphic + GH4 + 4kUHD

$
0
0

I found a bit of free time to try out this camera & lens combo. The super sharp ISCO Anamorphic Ultra Star (2x squeeze) and my GH4 shooting at 4kUHD. The video file has been re compressed 3 times including youtubes compression. Try to watch in HD.

My base lens that the ISCO was screwed onto was my good old manual Olympus 50mm f1.8 (OM) EXTRA INFO - because my Olympus 50mm was adapted for a canon mount i also had a Canon to M43 adapter fitted to the GH4. Picture profile was CineLike-D. 4k Footage was imported and edited in Davinci Resolve 11 Lite. When exporting from the 4k timeline to a Mp4 master file the blacks were pulled down slightly, even when i had the correct export setting like 'DATA' value instead of 'VIDEO' value, so the footage should have been Flatter looking. Thanks for watching.
Viewing all 69 articles
Browse latest View live